<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Your Competition&#8217;s Processes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/</link>
	<description>Fascinating, Inspiring, Rewarding and Engaging kinded spirits.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Transmission Content + Creative, Mark Goren, New Marketing Coach &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wish I Wrote That – 6</title>
		<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-52719</link>
		<dc:creator>Transmission Content + Creative, Mark Goren, New Marketing Coach &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wish I Wrote That – 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsonfire.com/blog/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-52719</guid>
		<description>[...] The Post Brains on Fire &#62; On your competition’s process [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Post Brains on Fire &gt; On your competition’s process [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Denny</title>
		<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-50253</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsonfire.com/blog/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-50253</guid>
		<description>Spike: this is a very insightful post. Everybody's looking for the 'magic bullet' when it comes to the hard, heavy lifting of re-engineering their processes. But let's not call the exercise futile -- you just boiled it down to 'the plane between your feet', so concentrate your competitive analysis in that space and look at the 'pre' part of their process in the most efficient manner possible. 

Are they practicing the lost art of 'club mojo' and swinging it around aimlessly prior to getting between the feet? Are they chopping at it from 12 inches away? 

I'm no golfer (and from what I've seen, most golfers aren't golfers, either), but as an aging former tennis instructor (and current Little League combination coach/bat boy), but it sounds like a familiar problem to what I've faced before; clearly, as a marketer, I've answered this question before, too. 

. How do you get the club to the point of contact so that you have the least variability, time after time? (An easily repeatable, scalable, predictable process).

. How do you concentrate your efforts on eliminating variability between the feet? (What can you instill in the client -- or identify in the competition -- that creates or reduces variability). 

. How do you document the 'right' process and ensure that it will live and evolve over numerous headcount turnovers? 

Sounds like a fun assignment -- good luck with it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spike: this is a very insightful post. Everybody&#8217;s looking for the &#8216;magic bullet&#8217; when it comes to the hard, heavy lifting of re-engineering their processes. But let&#8217;s not call the exercise futile &#8212; you just boiled it down to &#8216;the plane between your feet&#8217;, so concentrate your competitive analysis in that space and look at the &#8216;pre&#8217; part of their process in the most efficient manner possible. </p>
<p>Are they practicing the lost art of &#8216;club mojo&#8217; and swinging it around aimlessly prior to getting between the feet? Are they chopping at it from 12 inches away? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m no golfer (and from what I&#8217;ve seen, most golfers aren&#8217;t golfers, either), but as an aging former tennis instructor (and current Little League combination coach/bat boy), but it sounds like a familiar problem to what I&#8217;ve faced before; clearly, as a marketer, I&#8217;ve answered this question before, too. </p>
<p>. How do you get the club to the point of contact so that you have the least variability, time after time? (An easily repeatable, scalable, predictable process).</p>
<p>. How do you concentrate your efforts on eliminating variability between the feet? (What can you instill in the client &#8212; or identify in the competition &#8212; that creates or reduces variability). </p>
<p>. How do you document the &#8216;right&#8217; process and ensure that it will live and evolve over numerous headcount turnovers? </p>
<p>Sounds like a fun assignment &#8212; good luck with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spike</title>
		<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-49280</link>
		<dc:creator>Spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsonfire.com/blog/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-49280</guid>
		<description>Hey Michael, thanks for the comment. We're still talking to the potential client, so I'll post on here when anything happens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Michael, thanks for the comment. We&#8217;re still talking to the potential client, so I&#8217;ll post on here when anything happens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Morton</title>
		<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2007/04/20/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-49272</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsonfire.com/blog/on-your-competitions-processes/#comment-49272</guid>
		<description>I agree with Greg's thought. However, would you take that explanation back to the potential client? If so, did the client sign on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Greg&#8217;s thought. However, would you take that explanation back to the potential client? If so, did the client sign on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
