<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Bad Naming Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2006/04/27/another-bad-naming-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2006/04/27/another-bad-naming-idea/</link>
	<description>Fascinating, Inspiring, Rewarding and Engaging kinded spirits.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://brainsonfire.com/blog/2006/04/27/another-bad-naming-idea/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2006 04:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brainsonfire.com/blog/another-bad-naming-idea/#comment-897</guid>
		<description>TMN?  To better define themselves?

I couldn't agree more... that's just plain dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMN?  To better define themselves?</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more&#8230; that&#8217;s just plain dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
